Marijuana is legal in Montana, but driving while impaired by it is not. As cannabis use has become more common, so have THC DUI charges, and they have quickly grown into one of the areas of impaired-driving law we are asked about most. A&M Law has successfully resolved a number of these cases, and we have seen firsthand how different they are from a standard alcohol DUI.
The Legal Standard: Montana's 5 ng/mL THC Limit
Montana addresses marijuana-impaired driving in two distinct ways, and you can be charged under either one.
- The per se THC limit. Montana sets a per se limit of 5 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) of delta-9-THC in whole blood. If a blood test places you at or above 5 ng/mL, the State can charge you with DUI per se. As with the 0.08% alcohol standard, per se means the prosecution does not have to separately prove that you were actually impaired. The number alone is the offense.
- The impairment standard. Independent of any THC number, Montana makes it unlawful to drive while under the influence of any drug, including cannabis, to a degree that affects your ability to drive safely. Under this theory you can be charged at any THC level, including below 5 ng/mL, if the officer concludes that marijuana impaired your driving.
Montana recodified its impaired-driving statutes in 2021 (Title 61, Chapter 8, Part 10 of the Montana Code Annotated), and the marijuana-DUI provisions live within that framework alongside the alcohol rules. The penalties track the same structure: a first, second, and third offense are generally misdemeanors, while a fourth or subsequent offense becomes a felony.
Why THC Cases Are Different From Alcohol Cases
Alcohol leaves the body at a fairly predictable rate, which is what makes a breath or blood number a reasonable proxy for impairment at the time of driving. THC behaves very differently. Delta-9-THC can be detected in the blood of regular users hours or even days after use, long after any impairing effect has worn off. As a result, a number at or above 5 ng/mL does not always mean a person was impaired when they were behind the wheel.
That gap between what the test measures and what actually happened on the road is often the heart of a THC DUI defense. It is also why legal or medical cannabis use is not, by itself, a shield: legality governs whether you may possess and use marijuana, not whether you may drive after doing so.
How These Charges Are Proven
THC is not measured by a standard roadside breath test. Proving a marijuana DUI typically depends on a combination of:
- A blood draw analyzed for delta-9-THC, governed by Montana's implied-consent law
- Observations from the traffic stop and any field sobriety testing
- An evaluation by a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE), where one is used
- Officer testimony about driving behavior, odor, and physical signs
Each of these has weak points. Blood draws have to be timed, handled, stored, and tested correctly. DRE protocols are detailed and frequently applied imperfectly. And field sobriety tests were designed for alcohol, not cannabis, which raises real questions about what they actually show.
How A&M Law Defends THC DUI Cases
Misty Gaubatz is certified in NHTSA Standardized Field Sobriety Tests, the same certification the arresting officer holds, and she brings a prosecutor's understanding of how the State assembles a drug-DUI case. We prepare every matter as though it will go to trial, and we routinely examine:
- Whether the officer had a lawful basis for the stop
- What the THC result genuinely establishes about impairment at the time of driving
- How the blood sample was drawn, stored, and tested, and whether the chain of custody holds up
- Whether any drug-recognition evaluation followed proper protocol
- Whether your constitutional rights were respected throughout
That preparation is what creates leverage, whether a case is resolved through a motion to suppress, a negotiated reduction, or a verdict.
