We believe deeply in Cooperative Family Law. We helped create it. But part of giving honest advice is admitting that it isn't right for every situation. Recommending a cooperative process where it won't work would do a client real harm. So here's a candid look at when a different approach is the better choice.
When There's Abuse or Intimidation
The cooperative model depends on two people negotiating as equals. Where there's a history of domestic violence, intimidation, or coercive control, that equality doesn't exist, and sitting across a table can be unsafe or unfair. In those situations, the structure and protections of the court process often serve a client far better.
When a Spouse Won't Be Honest
Voluntary, full financial disclosure is the engine of a cooperative divorce. If one spouse is hiding assets, refusing to share information, or negotiating in bad faith, the process can't function. Sometimes the formal discovery tools of litigation are the only way to uncover the truth.
When One Person Simply Won't Participate
It takes two. If your spouse refuses to engage in good faith, or won't engage at all, the cooperative path isn't available, no matter how much you want it. That doesn't leave you without options; it just means a different strategy.
What We Do Instead
When cooperation isn't the right fit, we're fully prepared to protect you through mediation where appropriate, or through assertive, well-prepared litigation when that's what your situation demands. The goal never changes: the best, safest outcome for you and your children. If you're unsure which path fits, a free consultation will give you a straight answer.