In Montana criminal law, bodily injury means "physical pain, illness, or an impairment of physical condition and includes mental illness or impairment" (MCA § 45-2-101(5)). A visible injury is not part of the definition. That definition applies to partner or family member assault, so a PFMA charge can rest on pain that left no mark. This page is part of our Montana Domestic Violence Guide.
Where Bodily Injury Fits in the PFMA Statute
Two of the three forms of PFMA require bodily injury: purposely or knowingly causing bodily injury to a partner or family member (MCA § 45-5-206(1)(a)), and negligently causing bodily injury to one with a weapon (§ 45-5-206(1)(b)). The third form, covered in reasonable apprehension, requires no injury at all.
The PFMA statute does not define the term itself. The definition comes from the general definitions section of the criminal code, § 45-2-101, and it is the same one used for ordinary assault.
The Three Parts of the Definition
- Physical pain. The statute sets no minimum. It does not say the pain must be severe, lasting, or treated by a doctor.
- Illness. Less common in PFMA cases, but part of the definition.
- An impairment of physical condition. Bruising, swelling, a cut, a sprain, or anything else that leaves the body working less well than before.
The definition also "includes mental illness or impairment." The code does not explain what proof that requires, and it is not the same thing as being frightened or upset.
Is a Visible Injury Required?
No. Because physical pain is enough, a case can go forward where the other person said it hurt and nothing showed. This surprises many people who assume that no marks means no case.
It cuts both ways, though. The State still carries the burden of proving the pain or impairment beyond a reasonable doubt. Whether there were marks, what the photographs show, whether medical care was sought, and whether descriptions of the event stayed consistent are all things a judge or jury may consider. The lack of a visible injury is not a legal bar to the charge. It is evidence, and its weight depends on everything else in the case. Our page on no injury and no fear looks at this from the defense side.
Bodily Injury vs. Serious Bodily Injury
| Term | Definition | MCA | Used in |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bodily injury | Physical pain, illness, or an impairment of physical condition, including mental illness or impairment | § 45-2-101(5) | PFMA, assault |
| Serious bodily injury | Bodily injury that creates a substantial risk of death, or causes (or can reasonably be expected to cause) serious permanent disfigurement or protracted loss or impairment of a bodily member or organ | § 45-2-101(66) | Aggravated assault |
The difference is large. PFMA with bodily injury is punished under § 45-5-206. Purposely or knowingly causing serious bodily injury is aggravated assault, punishable by up to 20 years in state prison (MCA § 45-5-202). See aggravated assault on a partner.
One kind of conduct has its own statute regardless of visible injury. Impeding a partner or family member's breathing or blood circulation by pressure on the throat or neck, or by blocking the nose and mouth, is strangulation of a partner or family member under MCA § 45-5-215. That statute does not require proof of bodily injury.
How Bodily Injury Is Proved
The statutes do not prescribe a method of proof. In practice the evidence usually comes from some combination of:
- Testimony from the alleged victim or other witnesses about what happened and what was felt.
- What responding officers saw and wrote down, including redness, swelling, or the absence of either.
- Photographs taken at the scene or afterward.
- The 911 recording and body camera video.
- Medical records, when treatment was sought.
Each has limits. Photographs can be unclear, marks can have other causes, and timing matters. See body cameras, photos, and medical records for how this evidence is obtained and tested.
Injury Alone Is Not the Whole Offense
Proof that someone was hurt does not finish the State's case. The prosecution must also prove that the accused caused the injury, that the accused acted purposely or knowingly (or negligently with a weapon), and that the other person is a partner or family member. An injury that resulted from an accident, or from force used in lawful self-defense, raises different questions from an injury caused deliberately.
If you have been charged, do not contact the other person to talk about what the injury was or was not. A no contact order may prohibit it, and that kind of conversation can lead to new allegations. Give your account to your lawyer instead. A&M Law defends PFMA charges in Western Montana: see our PFMA defense page.
This page explains Montana law in general as of the 2025 Montana Code Annotated. It is not legal advice about your specific case.
